<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>機器人｜Next GooDay</title><subtitle>機器人模型、供應鏈與產業窗口的分析，區分官方自評與獨立驗證。</subtitle><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://next-gooday-site.pages.dev/tags/robotics/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://next-gooday-site.pages.dev/tags/robotics/feed.xml"/><id>https://next-gooday-site.pages.dev/tags/robotics/</id><updated>2026-09-03T08:10:00+08:00</updated><entry><title>Gemini Robotics ER 2 會看進度、會叫工具，但 Google 自評不是「已能上工」證明</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://next-gooday-site.pages.dev/articles/gemini-robotics-er-2-progress-aware-robot-brain/"/><id>https://next-gooday-site.pages.dev/articles/gemini-robotics-er-2-progress-aware-robot-brain/</id><published>2026-09-03T08:10:00+08:00</published><updated>2026-09-03T08:10:00+08:00</updated><summary>Gemini Robotics ER 2 是高階協調層，負責影像理解、任務編排與工具呼叫；官方評測與安全限制都不能證明它已能在真實場域長時間無人監督。</summary><author><name>AppleDad</name></author></entry><entry><title>臺灣機器人有「三到五年窗口」嗎？這是智庫研判，不是產業倒數</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://next-gooday-site.pages.dev/articles/taiwan-humanoid-robot-supply-chain-window-analysis/"/><id>https://next-gooday-site.pages.dev/articles/taiwan-humanoid-robot-supply-chain-window-analysis/</id><published>2026-09-03T08:10:00+08:00</published><updated>2026-09-03T08:10:00+08:00</updated><summary>DSET 分析者提出三到五年的策略窗口；臺灣確有系統整合、精密零件與先進半導體優勢，但需求、投資誘因、技術成熟度與量產訂單仍是缺口。</summary><author><name>AppleDad</name></author></entry></feed>